Skip to content
PandorIAThe box is already open
All entries

capabilitiesIn brief · · · Written with AI

Kevin Roose: about 50 people decide where AI goes

In an interview with Sam Harris, the journalist argues that those who predicted AI would stall have been wrong for years, and that very few people make the key decisions.

Video: Sam Harris · Playing it loads it from YouTube.

In an interview with Sam Harris, published on 20 October, journalist Kevin Roose, author of The AGI Chronicles, argues that those who said language models were "stochastic parrots" or would plateau have been wrong for years. In his account, capabilities have improved steadily as models got bigger and used more computing power, as the authors of the scaling laws, Dario Amodei among them, had predicted.

Roose acknowledges that today's models are no longer just language models, because they also use reinforcement learning, and that some skeptics have given ground.

He also estimates that about 50 people, perhaps fewer, can decide whether to slow down or carry on. That is his estimate, not a measured figure. No skeptic appears in the video.

Sources

Written by AI from these sources.

  1. Why the AI Skeptics Keep Being WrongAccessed 21 October 2026 · Image: Sam Harris

In this story